MX-5 Wheel Alignment Specs..

Technical Guidance for doing those Tricky Jobs

Moderators: timk, Stu, zombie, Andrew, -alex, miata, PUR157

User avatar
MrRevhead
Racing Driver
Posts: 715
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 2:40 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: NW Sydney

Re: MX-5 Wheel Alignment Specs..

Postby MrRevhead » Thu Jan 15, 2015 5:56 pm

I've booked my car in for an alignment on Saturday.

After reading FM's, 949's and Lanny's alignment specs (that are all different), does anyone else have any successful specs to share?

I'm considering Broady's specs from Stu @ Spinning Wheels, but then saw that he changed it in his next alignment a few months later...opinions/feedbacks on his specs?

max caster

front camber -.5 deg
rear camber -1.4 deg

.2 deg toe in front .3 deg toe in rear


I'm on 15x7's with coilovers and a 12" (300mm) hub to guard ride height. Standard sways (NA6).

I am after a street spec with some spirited driving.

Cheers
1991 NA6 BRG Limited Edition #124 (Aus Delivered)
Image

Magpie
Speed Racer
Posts: 7468
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 12:49 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Purga, QLD

Re: MX-5 Wheel Alignment Specs..

Postby Magpie » Thu Jan 15, 2015 6:17 pm

My current is -3.5° F & -3.0° R camber, Zero toe and 2.3° caster, however I am running R specs and very little road use. The car has an issue with caster at the moment

In the past I have use -2.0°/-1.5° F/R camber, Zero toe and 3° caster with no issues.

What ride heights are you running?
Will the wheel alignment place allow you to sit in the car when they are doing the alignment? This will change the amount of toe they set.
How old are the alignment bolts as they do stretch?

User avatar
MrRevhead
Racing Driver
Posts: 715
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 2:40 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: NW Sydney

Re: MX-5 Wheel Alignment Specs..

Postby MrRevhead » Thu Jan 15, 2015 6:25 pm

Magpie wrote:My current is -3.5° F & -3.0° R camber, Zero toe and 2.3° caster, however I am running R specs and very little road use. The car has an issue with caster at the moment

In the past I have use -2.0°/-1.5° F/R camber, Zero toe and 3° caster with no issues.

What ride heights are you running?
Will the wheel alignment place allow you to sit in the car when they are doing the alignment? This will change the amount of toe they set.
How old are the alignment bolts as they do stretch?

Thanks Magpie, those specs do seem more agressive/track orientated. I am more after spirited, daily driving specs.

12" (300mm) hub to fender ride height (approx 110mm ground to pinch welds)

I assume the bolts are stock.
1991 NA6 BRG Limited Edition #124 (Aus Delivered)
Image

Magpie
Speed Racer
Posts: 7468
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 12:49 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Purga, QLD

Re: MX-5 Wheel Alignment Specs..

Postby Magpie » Thu Jan 15, 2015 6:42 pm

The second one is no too agressive, however my current one is :)

manga_blue
Forum Guru
Posts: 4897
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 7:27 pm
Vehicle: NA8
Location: Moruya, NSW

Re: MX-5 Wheel Alignment Specs..

Postby manga_blue » Thu Jan 15, 2015 6:46 pm

max caster

front camber -.5 deg
rear camber -1.4 deg

.2 deg toe in front .3 deg toe in rear
It'll drive like cold porridge with that.

Magpie is on the money for a street car with -2.0/-1.5 camber, zero toe and as much castor as you can reasonably get.
’95 NA8

Magpie
Speed Racer
Posts: 7468
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 12:49 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Purga, QLD

Re: MX-5 Wheel Alignment Specs..

Postby Magpie » Thu Jan 15, 2015 6:55 pm

For minimum tire wear and power loss, the wheels on a given axle of a car should point directly ahead when the car is running in a straight line. Excessive toe-in or toe-out causes the tires to scrub, since they are always turned relative to the direction of travel. Too much toe-in causes accelerated wear at the outboard edges of the tires, while too much toe-out causes wear at the inboard edges.

The toe setting on a particular car becomes a tradeoff between the straight-line stability afforded by toe-in and the quick steering response promoted by toe-out. Nobody wants their street car to constantly wander over tar strips-the never-ending steering corrections required would drive anyone batty. But racers are willing to sacrifice a bit of stability on the straightaway for a sharper turn-in to the corners. So street cars are generally set up with toe-in, while race cars are often set up with toe-out.

Not my words :)

In addition toe in/out adds friction/drag to the car and will impact on acceleration and speed. Again not really a street issue but if you are looking at getting the best acceleration for spirited driving consider Zero toe.

My Words :)

User avatar
MrRevhead
Racing Driver
Posts: 715
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 2:40 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: NW Sydney

Re: MX-5 Wheel Alignment Specs..

Postby MrRevhead » Thu Jan 15, 2015 7:04 pm

Yes, I am also prioritising tyre wear as I have acquired a new set of KU31's :D

I just thought F 2 degree R 1.5 degree camber was a little excessive given previous reponses/posts and from what I have read.

But if you guys have had good results with those on the street, I am willing to give it a try and tweak further on if it doesn't suit my driving style. :beer:
1991 NA6 BRG Limited Edition #124 (Aus Delivered)
Image

Magpie
Speed Racer
Posts: 7468
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 12:49 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Purga, QLD

Re: MX-5 Wheel Alignment Specs..

Postby Magpie » Thu Jan 15, 2015 7:32 pm

Also Zero toe :)

User avatar
MrRevhead
Racing Driver
Posts: 715
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 2:40 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: NW Sydney

Re: MX-5 Wheel Alignment Specs..

Postby MrRevhead » Thu Jan 15, 2015 7:43 pm

To summarise, street spec with spirited driving, recommended settings:

FRONT:

Caster: Max (3+ degrees)
Camber: 2 Degrees
Toe: 0 Degrees

REAR:

Camber: 1.5 Degrees
Toe: 0 Degrees

?
1991 NA6 BRG Limited Edition #124 (Aus Delivered)
Image

manga_blue
Forum Guru
Posts: 4897
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 7:27 pm
Vehicle: NA8
Location: Moruya, NSW

Re: MX-5 Wheel Alignment Specs..

Postby manga_blue » Thu Jan 15, 2015 8:42 pm

That's about it but you may find your suspension doesn't let you get as much as -2.0 at the front. If that's the case then drop the rear camber down so it's still 0.5 less than the front.
’95 NA8

User avatar
MrRevhead
Racing Driver
Posts: 715
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 2:40 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: NW Sydney

Re: MX-5 Wheel Alignment Specs..

Postby MrRevhead » Thu Jan 15, 2015 9:23 pm

Thanks Manga for the input
1991 NA6 BRG Limited Edition #124 (Aus Delivered)
Image

User avatar
Roadrunner
coyotes after you
Posts: 1108
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2012 9:02 pm
Vehicle: NB SE
Location: Newcastle

Re: MX-5 Wheel Alignment Specs..

Postby Roadrunner » Tue Feb 10, 2015 11:13 am

MrRevhead wrote:To summarise, street spec with spirited driving, recommended settings:

FRONT:

Caster: Max (3+ degrees)
Camber: 2 Degrees
Toe: 0 Degrees

REAR:

Camber: 1.5 Degrees
Toe: 0 Degrees

?


I got a wheel alignment done yesterday to these same specs (though 4deg caster from memory).
Difference is quite noticeable.
Going through my favourite freeway offramp S-bend, there's zero understeer where I use to get a little and the whole car just felt stable.
Will be interested to see how it goes over the next few weeks and at the next track day.
Will keep an eye on tyre wear.
The wheels sit a noticeable way in from the guards now too
MeepMeep

chefie
Fast Driver
Posts: 338
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 7:04 pm
Vehicle: NB8B
Location: Brisbane
Contact:

Re: MX-5 Wheel Alignment Specs..

Postby chefie » Sat May 23, 2015 9:29 pm

What a difference a alignment makes

I recently installed BC Br series and had a full race alignment done by a race alignment guru in Brisbane, the first day out was Lakeside and my first in 4 months at this track. the car felt skittish and after an oh f^% moment sideways at 160Ks at the left after the bridge I slid on the outside track grass to a dead stop to touch the wall with my finger, show my respect and drive away, I worked through the remainder of the day a bit tepid.

once home and a revue of the tyre wear I was at 60% contact wear on the fronts and 65-70% contact wear on the rears, below are the settings tyres specs and pressures for the day.

all feedback welcome as i may have gone too aggressive on the camber settings and unbalanced a light car,

Front

camber Left -2.20 Caster +6.5
Camber Right -1.5 Caster +6.0
Toe 2.0 mm toe in

Rear
Camber Left -3.5
Camber left - 3.8

overall setting sq on car and Drivers side 5 mm short at axle to axle

Running Yokahama ado8Rs at 30Psi cold and 33-34 hot fresh rubber in January three track days
98 NB8A Grace Green
LS 66.17,QR Club 69.27, QRSpr 63.58 SOLD
01 NB8B Grace Green
LS 64.66,QRNat 1.31.94,QR Club 65.17 QRSpr 62.36
93 NA8 Clubman

Magpie
Speed Racer
Posts: 7468
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 12:49 pm
Vehicle: NA6
Location: Purga, QLD

Re: MX-5 Wheel Alignment Specs..

Postby Magpie » Sat May 23, 2015 9:53 pm

In general more negative camber in the front than the rear.

Whilst the amount of toe in will give you high speed stability it will impact turn in. You could run toe out front and toe in rear.

Try 3.5 neg front, 3.0 neg rear and zero toes. Maybe toe out front. Be aware toe will impact tire wear! Look at your tyre temps and adjust the alignment/pressures accordingly.

Who did the alignment in Brisbane?

M1474
Racing Driver
Posts: 771
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 3:43 am
Vehicle: ND - Turbo
Location: WA

Re: MX-5 Wheel Alignment Specs..

Postby M1474 » Mon May 25, 2015 1:04 am

I'm guessing you might already be maximum camber front? Reduce the rear camber to 2/3 or 3/4 whatever you can get on the front and remove most or all of the toe.
GHETTOCET


Return to “MX5 Technical Guides”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest